From owner-svn-ports-head@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 25 14:15:16 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4C63D890; Mon, 25 Aug 2014 14:15:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ainaz.pair.com (ainaz.pair.com [209.68.2.66]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 278EB307E; Mon, 25 Aug 2014 14:15:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.0.129] (vie-188-118-241-078.dsl.sil.at [188.118.241.78]) by ainaz.pair.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C34473F4DB; Mon, 25 Aug 2014 10:15:09 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2014 16:15:08 +0200 (CEST) From: Gerald Pfeifer To: Tijl Coosemans Subject: Re: svn commit: r365725 - head/lang/gcc5 In-Reply-To: <20140825144800.15a65f42@kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org> Message-ID: References: <201408231231.s7NCVa2w094830@svn.freebsd.org> <20140825144800.15a65f42@kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, Gerald Pfeifer , ports-committers@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the ports tree for head List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2014 14:15:16 -0000 On Mon, 25 Aug 2014, Tijl Coosemans wrote: > Wouldn't it be better to move the port to lang/gcc50? Presumably > the tools will also be gcc50, g++50 etc. right? No. :-) GCC changed the versioning scheme similar to FreeBSD: the next major releases after GCC 4.8 and GCC 4.9 are going to be GCC 5, GCC 6, GCC 7, and so forth. Accordingly I am planning to call the tools gcc5, g++5, gfortran5, and gcj5, respectively (and documented this in lang/gcc5/pkg-descr). Otherwise, we'd be changing that for bugfix releases. Does that make sense? Gerald