From owner-freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org  Mon Feb 22 19:32:47 2016
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org>
Delivered-To: freebsd-acpi@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
 by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29CAEAB0AF0
 for <freebsd-acpi@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org>;
 Mon, 22 Feb 2016 19:32:47 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org)
Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (Client did not present a certificate)
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1AC8410DA
 for <freebsd-acpi@FreeBSD.org>; Mon, 22 Feb 2016 19:32:47 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org)
Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118])
 by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id u1MJWkVF002823
 for <freebsd-acpi@FreeBSD.org>; Mon, 22 Feb 2016 19:32:46 GMT
 (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org)
From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org
To: freebsd-acpi@FreeBSD.org
Subject: [Bug 207419] Add ACPI support for RTC/CMOS device
Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2016 19:32:47 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System
X-Bugzilla-Component: kern
X-Bugzilla-Version: 11.0-CURRENT
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People
X-Bugzilla-Who: Scoobi_doo@yahoo.com
X-Bugzilla-Status: New
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: ---
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-acpi@FreeBSD.org
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-207419-13733-jsRkEi6CRQ@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-207419-13733@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-207419-13733@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20
Precedence: list
List-Id: ACPI and power management development <freebsd-acpi.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-acpi>,
 <mailto:freebsd-acpi-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-acpi/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-acpi-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-acpi>,
 <mailto:freebsd-acpi-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2016 19:32:47 -0000

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D207419

--- Comment #3 from Anthony Jenkins <Scoobi_doo@yahoo.com> ---
The upstream thread actually mirrors the evolution of my OSPM patch.  I fir=
st
tried adding code to the ACPICA code, then, based on some helpful suggestio=
ns
from acpi@, moved it to the atrtc(4) driver.  I agree with the last thread =
post
(https://lists.acpica.org/pipermail/devel/2016-February/000874.html) - that
support for RTC/CMOS devices belongs in the OSPM, not in the ACPICA.  If you
look closely at the OP's proposed ACPICA patch, the AcpiOs(Read|Write)Cmos()
handlers are no-ops (Read returns 0, Write does nothing).

I mean I can toss my $0.02 into the thread, but it'll be little more than "I
agree this shouldn't be added to ACPICA"...

--=20
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.=