From owner-cvs-src@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 2 19:44:09 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: cvs-src@freebsd.org Delivered-To: cvs-src@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE02616A420; Thu, 2 Feb 2006 19:44:09 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jhb@freebsd.org) Received: from speedfactory.net (mail6.speedfactory.net [66.23.216.219]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F88343D46; Thu, 2 Feb 2006 19:44:06 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jhb@freebsd.org) Received: from server.baldwin.cx (unverified [66.23.211.162]) by speedfactory.net (SurgeMail 3.5b3) with ESMTP id 7582683 for multiple; Thu, 02 Feb 2006 14:44:41 -0500 Received: from localhost (john@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by server.baldwin.cx (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k12Ji2PX003692; Thu, 2 Feb 2006 14:44:03 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from jhb@freebsd.org) From: John Baldwin To: Robert Watson Date: Thu, 2 Feb 2006 14:40:17 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1 References: <200602020037.k120b6iM014699@repoman.freebsd.org> <200602021345.38364.jhb@freebsd.org> <20060202190229.E38507@fledge.watson.org> In-Reply-To: <20060202190229.E38507@fledge.watson.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200602021440.20068.jhb@freebsd.org> X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.87.1/1270/Thu Feb 2 07:47:37 2006 on server.baldwin.cx X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.4 required=4.2 tests=ALL_TRUSTED autolearn=failed version=3.1.0 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.0 (2005-09-13) on server.baldwin.cx X-Server: High Performance Mail Server - http://surgemail.com r=1653887525 Cc: cvs-src@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org, cvs-all@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/kern kern_thread.c src/sys/security/audit audit.c audit.h src/sys/sys proc.h X-BeenThere: cvs-src@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the src tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Feb 2006 19:44:10 -0000 On Thursday 02 February 2006 14:03, Robert Watson wrote: > On Thu, 2 Feb 2006, John Baldwin wrote: > > Have you considered putting td_ar in the logical place in HEAD and only > > doing the ABI-friendly "hack" for RELENG_6? Maybe you could do the ABI > > thing in HEAD to make the MFC easier and then update HEAD after the MFC > > to be more intuitive? > > Yes -- I was actually going to commit it that way, but changed my mind at > the last minute. My reasoning was that if we plan to MFC the changes, it > is better to MFC them having tested them in the form they will be MFC'd. > Once they are MFC'd to RELENG_6, I will move the field back to the zero'd > section and remove the thread constructor hook. Ok, sounds great! -- John Baldwin <>< http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/ "Power Users Use the Power to Serve" = http://www.FreeBSD.org