From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Oct 20 01:55:30 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC1DC16A4CF; Wed, 20 Oct 2004 01:55:30 +0000 (GMT) Received: from odin.ac.hmc.edu (Odin.AC.HMC.Edu [134.173.32.75]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 462CE43D41; Wed, 20 Oct 2004 01:55:18 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from brdavis@odin.ac.hmc.edu) Received: from odin.ac.hmc.edu (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by odin.ac.hmc.edu (8.13.0/8.13.0) with ESMTP id i9K1txTA002807; Tue, 19 Oct 2004 18:55:59 -0700 Received: (from brdavis@localhost) by odin.ac.hmc.edu (8.13.0/8.13.0/Submit) id i9K1txdg002806; Tue, 19 Oct 2004 18:55:59 -0700 Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2004 18:55:59 -0700 From: Brooks Davis To: Mark Linimon Message-ID: <20041020015559.GA1846@odin.ac.hmc.edu> References: <20041019215007.GA13217@VARK.MIT.EDU> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="vkogqOf2sHV7VnPd" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=8.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on odin.ac.hmc.edu cc: src-committers@FreeBSD.org cc: John Baldwin cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org cc: David Schultz cc: "M. Warner Losh" Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/lib/libc/i386/net htonl.S ntohl.S X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the entire tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2004 01:55:31 -0000 --vkogqOf2sHV7VnPd Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Oct 19, 2004 at 08:45:22PM -0500, Mark Linimon wrote: > On Tue, 19 Oct 2004, David Schultz wrote: >=20 > > Yes, and very few of those [embedded systems] folks are likely to want > > a relatively large, non-realtime, monolithic, multi-threaded OS kernel, > > much less a userland that even vaguely resembles a standard FreeBSD > > installation. >=20 > I think it's fair to ask, are there any such people (e.g. using FreeBSD > on embedded systems)? >=20 > I mean, my background includes a lot of embedded systems work so I'm > biased towards it, but there is also no point in trying to optimize > FreeBSD for a null set of users. (That's what the ports tree is for. > Hey, don't throw that 386 box at me!) If there's actually a need there's always the option of creating an 80386 port. A developer I'm not going to name here recently said that if someone like NASA comes to us and says, "we'd love to use FreeBSD on this satellite, but we need to run on in 80386", he'd do the port himself. -- Brooks --=20 Any statement of the form "X is the one, true Y" is FALSE. PGP fingerprint 655D 519C 26A7 82E7 2529 9BF0 5D8E 8BE9 F238 1AD4 --vkogqOf2sHV7VnPd Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFBdcWvXY6L6fI4GtQRArrzAKCPcM7rD9F8BUv3nWx1Gkl98RhufgCfUwhj Icmz9kXxsFgLHTCMmj6fQsk= =SNKw -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --vkogqOf2sHV7VnPd--