From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 27 10:56:22 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC06016A41F for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 10:56:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from corwin@amber.aeternal.net) Received: from amber.aeternal.net (amber.in.markiza.sk [62.168.76.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29FAD43D45 for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 10:56:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from corwin@amber.aeternal.net) Received: from localhost (localhost.aeternal.net [127.0.0.1]) by amber.aeternal.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79776B853 for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 12:59:42 +0200 (CEST) Received: from amber.aeternal.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (amber.aeternal.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 03869-04 for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 12:59:37 +0200 (CEST) Received: from amber.aeternal.net (localhost.aeternal.net [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by amber.aeternal.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74631B852 for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 12:59:37 +0200 (CEST) Received: (from corwin@localhost) by amber.aeternal.net (8.13.3/8.13.1/Submit) id j6RAxbsS008436 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 12:59:37 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from corwin) Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 12:59:36 +0200 From: martin hudec To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20050727105936.GA97664@amber.aeternal.net> References: <491A44A6-1409-4D9E-AEFD-2B8665D52BA7@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="7AUc2qLy4jB3hD7Z" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Copyright: (C) 2005 Martin Hudec X-Operating-System: FreeBSD amber.aeternal.net 5.4-STABLE i386 X-PGP-Key: http://www.aeternal.net/corwin_aeternal.asc User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at aeternal.net Subject: Re: 100Mbit network performance - again X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: martin hudec List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 10:56:22 -0000 --7AUc2qLy4jB3hD7Z Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hello, On Wed, Jul 27, 2005 at 03:13:50AM +0400 or thereabouts, Andrew P. wrote: > Erm, well 60+Mbytes is no wonder in a Gigabit environment (and it is > too much of a wonder in a FastEthernet one), but I'm interested in > getting 100Mbit hardware to work at full speed. If I take that your "NE2000 $10 NIC's" is what you call 100Mbit hardware, then.. would you mind if I ask: what do you expect more from such $10-harware other than just to flicker and to eat electric current? =20 Use *real* 100Mbit hardware please :). BTW I have same performance with my sis900/rl8139 NIC's. cheers, Martin --=20 martin hudec * 421 907 303 393 * corwin@aeternal.net * http://www.aeternal.net "Nothing travels faster than the speed of light with the possible=20 exception of bad news, which obeys its own special laws." Douglas Adams, "The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy" --7AUc2qLy4jB3hD7Z Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFC52kYZYEZIv+rgggRAsQ/AJ9EIWQ1K8iLGyISvxG3pmz5pukYLACeP59n nXxASdzmQHFJM8AI3lwQk7k= =mKF0 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --7AUc2qLy4jB3hD7Z--