From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Nov 11 22:26:21 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx2.freebsd.org (mx2.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::35]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A6581065675 for ; Fri, 11 Nov 2011 22:26:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dougb@FreeBSD.org) Received: from 172-17-198-245.globalsuite.net (hub.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::36]) by mx2.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2A701794E3; Fri, 11 Nov 2011 22:25:43 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <4EBDA0E7.4030707@FreeBSD.org> Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2011 14:25:43 -0800 From: Doug Barton Organization: http://SupersetSolutions.com/ User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:8.0) Gecko/20111110 Thunderbird/8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: George Kontostanos References: In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: undefined OpenPGP: id=1A1ABC84 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-current , Benjamin Kaduk Subject: Re: Use of newest version number such as 10.0 instead of current X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2011 22:26:21 -0000 On 11/11/2011 14:23, George Kontostanos wrote: > BTW I follow both stable and current lists. I have noticed that people > still ask questions in current regarding 9-RC(*) problems. > Maybe if it was clear that current is now 10 this would not happen. Actually up until the actual release we encourage users to ask about the new branch on -current, for a variety of reasons. -- "We could put the whole Internet into a book." "Too practical." Breadth of IT experience, and depth of knowledge in the DNS. Yours for the right price. :) http://SupersetSolutions.com/