From owner-svn-ports-all@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 25 14:22:02 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-ports-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0D127C3C; Mon, 25 Aug 2014 14:22:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from shepard.synsport.net (mail.synsport.com [208.69.230.148]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 794B53159; Mon, 25 Aug 2014 14:22:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.0.22] (unknown [130.255.19.191]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by shepard.synsport.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6951943BF4; Mon, 25 Aug 2014 09:21:41 -0500 (CDT) Message-ID: <53FB4664.8090902@marino.st> Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2014 16:21:24 +0200 From: John Marino Reply-To: marino@freebsd.org User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Adam Weinberger , marino@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r365735 - in head/games: . prboom-plus References: <201408231404.s7NE4Ds7036892@svn.freebsd.org> <20140825093243.GC66191@FreeBSD.org> <53FB3FB3.90508@marino.st> <9A340EAF-EEDD-4D38-B4D8-5FD3C2C9EED7@adamw.org> <53FB4122.3060402@marino.st> <30BF3C98-F800-406C-AAEF-6FC3E0ABF01C@adamw.org> In-Reply-To: <30BF3C98-F800-406C-AAEF-6FC3E0ABF01C@adamw.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org, Alexey Dokuchaev , Adam Weinberger , svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, ports-committers@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: svn-ports-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the ports tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2014 14:22:02 -0000 On 8/25/2014 16:06, Adam Weinberger wrote: >> It's more than that -- Let's say you really think starting with "A >> " is essential not matter what the rule is, then it makes sense to >> discuss it to prevent it in the future. It's not being lazy or >> critical, it's educating. At least I believe that is the intent. > > I have worked quite hard the last few days to commit all staging PRs, > clear out nearly every patch-ready PR, and a lot of other PRs too. I > missed one article in one COMMENT. I missed it because it read quite > clearly. > > But sure, please re-educate me. Clearly I believe that adding > articles is essential no matter what the rule is. You discovered my > secret subversive mission. So you were just playing before? I thought you were serious about how the comment looked and didn't know the "rule" was unconditional. BTW, I noticed when it was committed but I didn't say anything because it is so minor in the scheme of the universe. John