From owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 24 16:20:21 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C96D416A430 for ; Fri, 24 Mar 2006 16:20:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 630EF43D46 for ; Fri, 24 Mar 2006 16:20:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (gnats@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k2OGKLtt098230 for ; Fri, 24 Mar 2006 16:20:21 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id k2OGKKRG098229; Fri, 24 Mar 2006 16:20:20 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2006 16:20:20 GMT Message-Id: <200603241620.k2OGKKRG098229@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org From: Vivek Khera Cc: Subject: Re: kern/94863: [bge] hack to get bge(4) working on IBM e326m X-BeenThere: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Vivek Khera List-Id: Bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2006 16:20:21 -0000 The following reply was made to PR kern/94863; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Vivek Khera To: Lucas Nussbaum Cc: bug-followup@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: kern/94863: [bge] hack to get bge(4) working on IBM e326m Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2006 11:18:10 -0500 On Mar 24, 2006, at 11:14 AM, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > Could you please provide a diff or a copy of your if_bge.* ? I was > planning to hack the driver next week to support an e326m, so it would > save me some time :-) I didn't change the bge.c file at all. I just changed the ID numbers for 5714 in bge_ifreg.h to be those values in my original PR. This obviously disabled the original 5714, but apparently this 5780 chip in the IBM needs the same special cases as the 5714. I'd just add the 5780 to the special cases you find for the 5714. Now that I have a real name for this chip, I can attempt making a real patch, unless you beat me to it.