From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 22 21:00:34 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0696916A4CA for ; Wed, 22 Mar 2006 21:00:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from elvis.mu.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 172E743DB2 for ; Wed, 22 Mar 2006 21:00:11 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by elvis.mu.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70C3A1A4E55; Wed, 22 Mar 2006 13:00:11 -0800 (PST) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 8B73E5348C; Wed, 22 Mar 2006 16:00:10 -0500 (EST) Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2006 16:00:10 -0500 From: Kris Kennaway To: Erik N?rgaard Message-ID: <20060322210010.GA26879@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <20060322050432.7801.qmail@web54512.mail.yahoo.com> <4421119C.1050002@locolomo.org> <20060322160052.E1178@ganymede.hub.org> <4421B9C6.10401@locolomo.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="azLHFNyN32YCQGCU" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4421B9C6.10401@locolomo.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Cc: "Marc G. Fournier" , rakhesh@rakhesh.com, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 6.1-BETA 4 stable for normal use? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2006 21:00:34 -0000 --azLHFNyN32YCQGCU Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Mar 22, 2006 at 09:55:34PM +0100, Erik N?rgaard wrote: > Marc G. Fournier wrote: > >>I am using 6.1-PRERELEASE which has actually been upgraded from=20 > >>6.1-BETA3. The system as such is stable, but there are some nuisances. > >>These are not fatal in any way but may cause confusion. So in=20 > >>particular if you're new to FreeBSD, better stay with 6.0. > > > >Like ... ? >=20 > Well, I have another machine at work which for some yet unknown reason=20 > requires me to reload the pf rule set in order to fetch - I posted on=20 > that last week. >=20 > And I have minor errors like when I run "man pf.conf" and exit the=20 > man-page then I get this error: >=20 > col: write error > grotty: ():31713:fatal error: output error Did you file PRs? If not, and you only posted to this list, your emails did not reach any of the relevant people. Kris --azLHFNyN32YCQGCU Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFEIbrZWry0BWjoQKURAqYlAJ9hV8Ajba7kNSyZaD3OqPEWjDAyMACdEFxh euo+F3ITq2ymekzYpek8A7M= =WO7y -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --azLHFNyN32YCQGCU--