From owner-freebsd-ports  Tue Mar 26  7: 7:44 2002
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Received: from alcatraz.iptelecom.net.ua (alcatraz.iptelecom.net.ua [212.9.224.15])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7936D37B405
	for <ports@FreeBSD.org>; Tue, 26 Mar 2002 07:07:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ipcard.iptcom.net (ipcard.iptcom.net [212.9.224.5])
	by alcatraz.iptelecom.net.ua (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id RAA57102;
	Tue, 26 Mar 2002 17:07:12 +0200 (EET)
	(envelope-from sobomax@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from vega.vega.com (h250.234.dialup.iptcom.net [212.9.234.250])
	by ipcard.iptcom.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id RAA60351;
	Tue, 26 Mar 2002 17:07:09 +0200 (EET)
	(envelope-from sobomax@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from FreeBSD.org (big_brother.vega.com [192.168.1.1])
	by vega.vega.com (8.11.6/8.11.3) with ESMTP id g2QF6bi28341;
	Tue, 26 Mar 2002 17:06:37 +0200 (EET)
	(envelope-from sobomax@FreeBSD.org)
Message-ID: <3CA08ECB.2CD005C6@FreeBSD.org>
Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2002 17:07:55 +0200
From: Maxim Sobolev <sobomax@FreeBSD.org>
Organization: Vega International Capital
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.79 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U)
X-Accept-Language: en,uk,ru
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Peter Pentchev <roam@ringlet.net>
Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: Dependencies' list problem
References: <20020326144530.E301@straylight.oblivion.bg>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <freebsd-ports.FreeBSD.ORG>
List-Archive: <http://docs.freebsd.org/mail/> (Web Archive)
List-Help: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=help> (List Instructions)
List-Subscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=subscribe%20freebsd-ports>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=unsubscribe%20freebsd-ports>
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org

Peter Pentchev wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> We've got a problem :)
> 
> The ALL-DEPENDS-LIST variable that is defined in bsd.port.mk lists
> (recursively) a port's dependencies, keeping a list of those processed
> and only adding new ones when they are not already in the list.
> 
> Or is that right?
> 
> [roam@straylight:v1 /usr/ports/x11/gnomecore]$ make all-depends-list | fgrep gettext
> /usr/ports/devel/gettext
> /usr/ports/devel/gettext-old
> [roam@straylight:v1 /usr/ports/x11/gnomecore]$ cd ../../devel/bonobo-conf/
> [roam@straylight:v1 /usr/ports/devel/bonobo-conf]$ make all-depends-list | fgrep gettext
> /usr/ports/devel/gettext-old
> [roam@straylight:v1 /usr/ports/devel/bonobo-conf]$
> 
> As you can see, devel/bonobo-conf, which depends on gnomecore, does NOT
> list devel/gettext as a dependency.  The reason?  Simple:
> ALL-DEPENDS-LIST uses ${GREP} -qwv (bsd.port.mk, line 3050), and grep(1)
> treats '-' as a word separator, thus stating that 'devel/gettext' is
> contained within 'devel/gettext-old' and need not be added to the list
> of dependencies.
> 
> How to repeat - either issue the commands above, or simply issue a
> 'make fetch-recursive' in ports/mail/evolution and watch it NOT fetch
> gettext-0.11.0..

You are wrong. bonobo-conf doesn't require gettext to build or run,
but requires gettext-old to run properly. Evolution requires gettext
for building and gettext-old for building and running, therefore you
see what you see.

-Maxim

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message