Date: Mon, 18 Sep 1995 13:12:17 EST From: "Kaleb S. KEITHLEY" <kaleb@x.org> To: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.tfs.com> Cc: hackers@freefall.FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Policy on printf format specifiers? Message-ID: <199509181712.NAA15302@exalt.x.org> In-Reply-To: Your message of Mon, 18 Sep 1995 05:31:58 EST. <6585.811427518@critter.tfs.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > Er, I don't have my copy of 10646 here at home. As I recall page 0 is just > > Latin1. If page 0 is in fact Unicode, which already has encodings for every > > written language on Earth, then what would 10646 need any other pages for? > The rest of the languages of course. :-) If page 0 (sic) is Unicode, which has *all* the languages, then what would the "rest of the languages" be? > Remember that the american continent wasn't with for until they found it... I can't parse this. Would somebody translate into German or Spanish for me? > As far as I recall there is still some concern about Sanskrit and 10646 > isn't there ? Does 10646 have Cuneiform?
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199509181712.NAA15302>