From owner-freebsd-hackers Mon Sep 18 10:13:01 1995 Return-Path: owner-hackers Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) id KAA23627 for hackers-outgoing; Mon, 18 Sep 1995 10:13:01 -0700 Received: from expo.x.org (expo.x.org [198.112.45.11]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) with ESMTP id KAA23616 for ; Mon, 18 Sep 1995 10:12:54 -0700 Received: from exalt.x.org by expo.x.org id AA02145; Mon, 18 Sep 95 13:12:22 -0400 Received: from localhost by exalt.x.org id NAA15302; Mon, 18 Sep 1995 13:12:17 -0400 Message-Id: <199509181712.NAA15302@exalt.x.org> To: Poul-Henning Kamp Cc: hackers@freefall.FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Policy on printf format specifiers? In-Reply-To: Your message of Mon, 18 Sep 1995 05:31:58 EST. <6585.811427518@critter.tfs.com> Organization: X Consortium Date: Mon, 18 Sep 1995 13:12:17 EST From: "Kaleb S. KEITHLEY" Sender: owner-hackers@FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > > Er, I don't have my copy of 10646 here at home. As I recall page 0 is just > > Latin1. If page 0 is in fact Unicode, which already has encodings for every > > written language on Earth, then what would 10646 need any other pages for? > The rest of the languages of course. :-) If page 0 (sic) is Unicode, which has *all* the languages, then what would the "rest of the languages" be? > Remember that the american continent wasn't with for until they found it... I can't parse this. Would somebody translate into German or Spanish for me? > As far as I recall there is still some concern about Sanskrit and 10646 > isn't there ? Does 10646 have Cuneiform?