From owner-freebsd-hackers Sun Dec 9 3:44:27 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (critter.freebsd.dk [212.242.86.163]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1C3137B405 for ; Sun, 9 Dec 2001 03:44:24 -0800 (PST) Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by critter.freebsd.dk (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id fB9Bgpj72362; Sun, 9 Dec 2001 12:42:51 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from phk@critter.freebsd.dk) To: mitko@rila.bg Cc: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Performance issue In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sun, 09 Dec 2001 12:57:48 +0200." <20011209125748.3d326e32.mitko@bgzone.com> Date: Sun, 09 Dec 2001 12:42:50 +0100 Message-ID: <72360.1007898170@critter.freebsd.dk> From: Poul-Henning Kamp Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG There are many effects that could cause this, for instance if FreeBSD manages to align things differently in relation to the CPU cache you could get some very interesting waste of time that way. Based on the data you show me, I can't really say that something is wrong or right either way. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message