Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 12 Aug 2001 13:19:09 -0700
From:      Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org>
To:        Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino <itojun@iijlab.net>
Cc:        net@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: IPV6/KAME/protosw integration cleanup
Message-ID:  <3B76E4BD.45E83378@elischer.org>
References:  <20010812200929.C276E7BA@starfruit.itojun.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino wrote:
> 
> >Please note that the ip6protosw is ALSO very broken
> 
>         unfortunately, you are wrong.  yes, protosw is supposed to be
>         protocol-independent.  however, due to the nature of IPv6 extension
>         headers (you can have infinite number of them) you can blow the kernel
>         stack very easily.  therefore, we had to do ip6protosw.h.
>         please read my Usenix paper (on m_pulldown and mbuf issues in BSD
>         IPv6 support) two years ago.

I didn't say it could be easily fixed, and note that I am not touching it now..

> 
> itojun

-- 
+------------------------------------+       ______ _  __
|   __--_|\  Julian Elischer         |       \     U \/ / hard at work in 
|  /       \ julian@elischer.org     +------>x   USA    \ a very strange
| (   OZ    )                                \___   ___ | country !
+- X_.---._/    presently in San Francisco       \_/   \\
          v

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3B76E4BD.45E83378>