From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 16 17:26:35 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35F5416A407 for ; Tue, 16 Jan 2007 17:26:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gabor@FreeBSD.org) Received: from server.t-hosting.hu (server.t-hosting.hu [217.20.133.7]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7D7D13C455 for ; Tue, 16 Jan 2007 17:26:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gabor@FreeBSD.org) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by server.t-hosting.hu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 662CD9C2342; Tue, 16 Jan 2007 18:26:32 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at t-hosting.hu Received: from server.t-hosting.hu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (server.t-hosting.hu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id BXxqieT1KAxK; Tue, 16 Jan 2007 18:26:26 +0100 (CET) Received: from [192.168.2.186] (catv-50635cb6.catv.broadband.hu [80.99.92.182]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by server.t-hosting.hu (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD8E69C231B; Tue, 16 Jan 2007 18:26:26 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <45AD0ABC.5070406@FreeBSD.org> Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2007 18:26:20 +0100 From: Gabor Kovesdan User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (Windows/20061207) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Joe Holden References: <45ACC615.2030200@joeholden.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <45ACC615.2030200@joeholden.co.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: ports@freebsd.org, portmgr@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: security/dsniff: Marked BROKEN X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2007 17:26:35 -0000 Joe Holden schrieb: > Does anyone know why this is the case? It builds and installs fine on > my machines. If its just a port conflict, surely just adding > CONFLICTS to the makefiles of both libnet ports etc would do the trick? > > Or is there another reason? > It seems there is a long-standing issue with net/libnet, net/libnet10 and net/libnet-devel ports, that affect about 40 ports, and dsniff is one of those. See the following three PRs: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/97257 http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/89098 http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/95733 And one that is supposed tofix the issue: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/103861 As it is a big change, that affects about 40 port, it needs test/approval from the Ports Management Team. I put them into CC, maybe they can give you more information, how they want this issue fixed. If you can help, that's highly appreciated, please consult with them about the issue. Regards, Gabor