From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 30 08:37:16 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22E4637B401 for ; Wed, 30 Apr 2003 08:37:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: from spmler1.mail.eds.com (spmler1.mail.eds.com [194.128.225.190]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C46B743F93 for ; Wed, 30 Apr 2003 08:37:14 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from thomas.sparrevohn@eds.com) Received: from spmlir2.mail.eds.com (spmlir2.mail.eds.com [205.191.69.42] (may be forged)) by spmler1.mail.eds.com (8.11.6p2/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h3UFb0901853; Wed, 30 Apr 2003 16:37:01 +0100 Received: from spmlir2.mail.eds.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spmlir2.mail.eds.com (8.11.6p2/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h3UFb0Y16861; Wed, 30 Apr 2003 16:37:00 +0100 Received: from ukspm101.exgb01.exch.eds.com ([204.230.90.43]) by spmlir2.mail.eds.com (8.11.6p2/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h3UFb0O16821; Wed, 30 Apr 2003 16:37:00 +0100 Received: by ukspm101.exgb01.exch.eds.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2656.59) id ; Wed, 30 Apr 2003 16:37:03 +0100 Message-ID: <2946E9F05C8DD511A7DC0002A5608CE4BEC3A5@GBCHM201> From: "Sparrevohn, Thomas" To: "'omestre@freeshell.org'" Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2003 16:37:00 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2656.59) Content-Type: text/plain cc: "'freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org'" Subject: RE: rpc.lockd X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2003 15:37:16 -0000 After changing my FS to UFS2 yesterday I saw strange behaviour from rpc.statd and rpc.lockd - The statd process grew to 256MB in size. There are memory leaks some where in the 5.0-Release with UFS2 that I did not see with UFS1 - It seems that inactive pages are never reclaimed and on a 1GB system during a make world I ended up with 8MB free. -- Thomas -----Original Message----- From: omestre@freeshell.org [mailto:omestre@freeshell.org] Sent: 29 April 2003 17:05 To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: rpc.lockd Hello, I'm having problems with rpc.lockd (nfs locks)... Now, i guess that i know "where is" the problem. I have one Linux box as my NFS server to Linux and FreBSD 4.x machines, working fine. I have some FreeBSD 5.0 machines that do not work the locks. Looking at the log in the Linux server, i have saw these messages: kernel: lockd: bad cookie size 16 (only cookies under 8 bytes are supported.) Without 5.0 clients, these messages go out! So, how can i make the rpc.lockd work like 4.x series? The 5.0 lock protocol, i guess, is incompatible with linux ( kernel 2.4.20). Thanks. --- _______________________________________________ freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-hackers-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"