From owner-freebsd-net Tue Apr 17 11:18:18 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu (khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu [18.24.4.193]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6971837B43E; Tue, 17 Apr 2001 11:17:58 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from wollman@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu) Received: (from wollman@localhost) by khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) id OAA13455; Tue, 17 Apr 2001 14:12:40 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from wollman) Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2001 14:12:40 -0400 (EDT) From: Garrett Wollman Message-Id: <200104171812.OAA13455@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu> To: "Crist Clark" Cc: freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG, net@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: non-random IP IDs In-Reply-To: <3ADC8368.C96550FE@globalstar.com> References: <20010416214611.6DA3F207C1@citi.umich.edu> <200104170157.f3H1v4d87804@earth.backplane.com> <20010416233042.A21394@xor.obsecurity.org> <200104171731.f3HHVFu94944@earth.backplane.com> <20010417103823.A49384@xor.obsecurity.org> <3ADC8368.C96550FE@globalstar.com> Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org < said: > Personally, I like (b). It's right there for those who want it, but > the bloat-watchers don't have to see that extra few bytes going to > kernelland. I think this is reasonable. With the way memory subsystems work these days, we need to avoid wasting valuable cache in order to get the maximum possible performance. -GAWollman To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message