Date: Thu, 20 May 2004 22:56:13 +0200 From: Remko Lodder <remko@elvandar.org> Cc: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [Freebsd-security] Re: Multi-User Security Message-ID: <40AD1B6D.2050204@elvandar.org> In-Reply-To: <20040520204710.GB12301@dragon.roe.ch> References: <20040518160517.GA10067@therub.org> <OPEPILILPLAKPFCNKOKAGEGHCBAA.remko@elvandar.org> <20040520033024.GA26640@therub.org> <20040520204710.GB12301@dragon.roe.ch>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hey Daniel and Dan, Daniel Roethlisberger wrote: > Dan Rue <drue@therub.org> [2004-05-19/22:30]: > >>You obviously havn't tried to chroot scponly users.. _that's_ the >>tricky part. Especially if you want it to scale up beyond a handful >>of users. If i'm wrong - fill me in i'd love to hear how to do it. > > > I second that. I've been chrooting sftp-only users for a while now, with > an approach similar to that of scponly, but I cannot say that my > solution is scaling particularly well... :-/ Well you are both correct that i did not implement the chroot thingy, but i just responded for the "non shell required" thingy, you can do that as well with thhe listed package. I personally dont have any scp only users so there is no need for me to implement the given thingy's. Excuse me if my information could be intrepetated differently then i ment. Cheers -- Kind regards, Remko Lodder Elvandar.org/DSINet.org www.mostly-harmless.nl Dutch community for helping newcomers on the hackerscene
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?40AD1B6D.2050204>