From owner-freebsd-hackers  Sun Apr  5 05:31:47 1998
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG>
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id FAA13863
          for freebsd-hackers-outgoing; Sun, 5 Apr 1998 05:31:47 -0700 (PDT)
          (envelope-from owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG)
Received: from labinfo.iet.unipi.it (labinfo.iet.unipi.it [131.114.9.5])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id FAA13829
          for <freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG>; Sun, 5 Apr 1998 05:31:42 -0700 (PDT)
          (envelope-from luigi@labinfo.iet.unipi.it)
Received: from localhost (luigi@localhost) by labinfo.iet.unipi.it (8.6.5/8.6.5) id LAA00342; Sun, 5 Apr 1998 11:51:17 +0200
From: Luigi Rizzo <luigi@labinfo.iet.unipi.it>
Message-Id: <199804050951.LAA00342@labinfo.iet.unipi.it>
Subject: Re: Softupdate for 2.2.6?
To: jkh@time.cdrom.com (Jordan K. Hubbard)
Date: Sun, 5 Apr 1998 11:51:16 +0200 (MET DST)
Cc: frank@our.domaintje.com, tcobb@staff.circle.net,
        freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
In-Reply-To: <3149.891774540@time.cdrom.com> from "Jordan K. Hubbard" at Apr 5, 98 04:08:41 am
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL23]
Content-Type: text
Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

> Q. Will any of the following features ever be in 2.2.x, even as
>    3rd party patches?
> 
> A. 1. Soft Updates:  No.
>    2. CAM: No.
>    3. SMP: No (you didn't ask, but I figured while I was making a list... :-)

since when is anyone in control of third party patches ?
(i mean except licensing restrictions). If some good soul wants to do
the backport and provide a patchfile, i don't see any problem with
that. I understand that you are being realistic and "No" means "I don't
think we'll ever find someone willing to do the backport"

	cheers
	luigi

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message