From owner-freebsd-stable  Mon Oct 19 01:51:18 1998
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id BAA07489
          for freebsd-stable-outgoing; Mon, 19 Oct 1998 01:51:18 -0700 (PDT)
          (envelope-from owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG)
Received: from time.cdrom.com (time.cdrom.com [204.216.27.226])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id BAA07480
          for <freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>; Mon, 19 Oct 1998 01:51:17 -0700 (PDT)
          (envelope-from jkh@time.cdrom.com)
Received: from time.cdrom.com (jkh@localhost.cdrom.com [127.0.0.1])
	by time.cdrom.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id BAA03720;
	Mon, 19 Oct 1998 01:50:26 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from jkh@time.cdrom.com)
To: Andrew Maltsev <am@amsoft.ru>
cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: -stable to 3.0 transition 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 19 Oct 1998 12:36:57 +0400."
             <199810190836.MAA01535@amsoft.ru> 
Date: Mon, 19 Oct 1998 01:50:25 -0700
Message-ID: <3716.908787025@time.cdrom.com>
From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com>
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

> What are possible caveats of transition from 2.2-stable system to
> 3.0? Will usual `make world' do the thing?

It should, yes.

> Btw, will 3.0-stable branch be forked?

After some of the dust finishes settling and 3.0 is more worthy of the
title.  Maybe January.

- Jordan

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message