Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 5 Sep 1999 14:42:07 -0500 (CDT)
From:      Kevin Day <toasty@dragondata.com>
To:        chuckr@picnic.mat.net (Chuck Robey)
Cc:        toasty@dragondata.com (Kevin Day), ugen@xonix.com (Ugen Antsilevitch), questions@FreeBSD.ORG, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: PCI modems do not work???
Message-ID:  <199909051942.OAA42708@celery.dragondata.com>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.10.9909051530020.89177-100000@picnic.mat.net> from "Chuck Robey" at Sep 05, 1999 03:33:04 PM

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> 
> On Sun, 5 Sep 1999, Kevin Day wrote:
> 
> > > 
> > >  Well.. i just looked through some archives and also on the
> > > recent traffic in freebsd-questions.
> > >  It seems there are great many people that have same problem i do - apparently
> > > our beloved system does not support PCI modems? Now if i am wrong here -
> > > kick me and ignore the rest of the message.
> > >  If i am right - this really has to be fixed and soon. There aren't many ISA
> > > 56K modems out there that aren't winmodems. On my last search everything that
> > > was 56K was divided about 80% winmodems and 20% PCI modems (with UART).
> > >  I don't think for someone with understanding of low level drivers implementing
> > > this should be too hard? After all all the difference AFAIK is in how interrupts
> > > are delivered from a device. It still has the same ports, doesn't it?
> > 
> > I'm actually going to look at doing this tommorow, but I have to admit the
> > sio driver isn't really going to like doing this. Has anyone looked at this
> > before and could possibly give any suggestions as to how I should begin
> > this?
> 
> Are you aware that the least part of making this work is the PCI
> interface question?  What's needed is the entire AT command set, and
> sometimes all the dsp processing too.  What's left on those PCI modems
> isn't as smart as my wind up alarm clock.  The only reason interfacing
> isn't a Windows nightmare is because of the Bios that all the Winmodems
> have (there isn't any standard for this strange interface).
> 

No, I'm working on adding support for PCI based non-winmodems. Modems that
still have a 16550 based uart interface to them, but just happen to sit on
the PCI bus. I'm not at all planning on writing support for winmodems, just
making sio.c understand UARTs on the PCI bus.

There *are* PCI modems out there that aren't winmodems, they're just hard to
find. 3Com makes one, as well as a few other companies.

Kevin


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199909051942.OAA42708>