From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Nov 21 18:59:45 2011
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B680F106566B
	for <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>; Mon, 21 Nov 2011 18:59:45 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from amvandemore@gmail.com)
Received: from mail-bw0-f54.google.com (mail-bw0-f54.google.com
	[209.85.214.54])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 498398FC2B
	for <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>; Mon, 21 Nov 2011 18:59:45 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by bkbzs8 with SMTP id zs8so9262378bkb.13
	for <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>; Mon, 21 Nov 2011 10:59:44 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
	h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
	:cc:content-type;
	bh=CdU08Kw6H5cZM8QrIU2ITidTTFdpzfEKvwBVLZOZJnU=;
	b=eE931j+TV57SpNyUpmKeobgf09qBtGUyEQWaI6A9+BigDGCrlzrQeU8fxD3RFE3rE9
	F1XUnhyY4Go6V8ArSLYDkpr5+U7HV7pUyjCChC377NWYiUYZ69VTSvSS3HkaeF8/ic1d
	pbMT6KXKXVu9au0vGBSuWm+vE3LXUmUW+R/XQ=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.204.9.209 with SMTP id m17mr15569383bkm.101.1321900349366;
	Mon, 21 Nov 2011 10:32:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.223.88.72 with HTTP; Mon, 21 Nov 2011 10:32:29 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <E04BD92A-EFEA-4EB4-BC57-1F07EC040383@lassitu.de>
References: <E04BD92A-EFEA-4EB4-BC57-1F07EC040383@lassitu.de>
Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2011 12:32:29 -0600
Message-ID: <CA+tpaK3J1BCvGLsNZ_LBuYs9ve08UJY=12HH9Ch+b=3wRbqKNg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Adam Vande More <amvandemore@gmail.com>
To: Stefan Bethke <stb@lassitu.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5
Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Limiting disk I/O by jail or uid?
X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD
	<freebsd-hackers.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-hackers>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers>,
	<mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2011 18:59:45 -0000

On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 11:47 AM, Stefan Bethke <stb@lassitu.de> wrote:

> I have a process that tends to eat up all available disk bandwidth.  I
> have other processes that I would like to have preference over this one
> process.  Is there a facility that would allow me to assign priorities
> based on jail ID or uid?
>
> This is on 8-stable (but will upgrade to 9 soon) on ZFS.
>
> The straightforward solution is to separate the datasets onto their own
> disks, which I'm planning to do, but a software facility would be that much
> more flexible.
>


http://wiki.freebsd.org/Hierarchical_Resource_Limits

-- 
Adam Vande More