Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2012 18:27:27 +0700 From: Erich Dollansky <erichfreebsdlist@ovitrap.com> To: Karl Pielorz <kpielorz_lst@tdx.co.uk> Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Threaded 6.4 code compiled under 9.0 uses a lot more memory?.. Message-ID: <20121030182727.48f5e649@X220.ovitrap.com> In-Reply-To: <A92CE63E6E6DB93B366F4A42@MightyAtom.tdx.co.uk> References: <A92CE63E6E6DB93B366F4A42@MightyAtom.tdx.co.uk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi, On Tue, 30 Oct 2012 11:12:22 +0000 Karl Pielorz <kpielorz_lst@tdx.co.uk> wrote: > Can anyone think of any quick pointers as to why some code originally > written under 6.4 amd64 - when re-compiled under 9.0-stable amd64 > takes up a *lot* more memory when running? > is it still the same compiler? > As an example, under 6.4 the size/res for one reported by top is > 81Mb/48Mb > - and for the other is 44Mb/9Mb [this is after it's been running for > weeks]. > I assume that it is a plain FreeBSD program without X. Erich
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20121030182727.48f5e649>