From owner-freebsd-arch  Wed May 30  6:29:24 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
Received: from mailman.zeta.org.au (mailman.zeta.org.au [203.26.10.16])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id D283C37B424; Wed, 30 May 2001 06:29:21 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from bde@zeta.org.au)
Received: from bde.zeta.org.au (bde.zeta.org.au [203.2.228.102])
	by mailman.zeta.org.au (8.9.3/8.8.7) with ESMTP id XAA14402;
	Wed, 30 May 2001 23:29:19 +1000
Date: Wed, 30 May 2001 23:27:46 +1000 (EST)
From: Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au>
X-Sender: bde@besplex.bde.org
To: arch@FreeBSD.ORG
Cc: "David E. O'Brien" <obrien@FreeBSD.ORG>
Subject: Re: Overriding compiler flags (Re: cvs commit: src/contrib/gcc.295
 gcc.c)
In-Reply-To: <20010529040250.A81586@xor.obsecurity.org>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0105302323390.18042-100000@besplex.bde.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <freebsd-arch.FreeBSD.ORG>
List-Archive: <http://docs.freebsd.org/mail/> (Web Archive)
List-Help: <mailto:majordomo?subject=help> (List Instructions)
List-Subscribe: <mailto:majordomo?subject=subscribe%20freebsd-arch>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:majordomo?subject=unsubscribe%20freebsd-arch>
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

On Tue, 29 May 2001, Kris Kennaway wrote:

> Hmm.  We now have a number of ways of achieving this (some of these
> only work in some contexts):
> 
> Defining CFLAGS with ?= instead of = in /etc/make.conf

This is a no-op, because CFLAGS is always defined in /etc/make.conf.

> COPTS in <bsd.prog.mk>
> CWARNFLAGS in <bsd.sys.mk> (included from <bsd.{kmod,lib,prog}.mk>)
> DEBUG_FLAGS in <bsd.{lib,prog}.mk>
> 
> The latter three obviously don't cover general code, but the plethora
> of options is starting to get ugly.

I agree.  It got ugly already :-).  And we don't even install the specs
file in /usr/libdata/gcc.

Bruce


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message