From owner-freebsd-current Tue Oct 26 8:23:49 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from penelope.skunk.org (penelope.skunk.org [208.133.204.51]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8C6414E18; Tue, 26 Oct 1999 08:23:35 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from ben@penelope.skunk.org) Received: from localhost (ben@localhost) by penelope.skunk.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id LAA86256; Tue, 26 Oct 1999 11:29:30 -0400 (EDT) Date: Tue, 26 Oct 1999 11:29:30 -0400 (EDT) From: Ben Rosengart Reply-To: freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG To: jbryant@tfs.net Cc: Kris Kennaway , freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: trek73 In-Reply-To: <199910252307.SAA59361@argus.tfs.net> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Mon, 25 Oct 1999, Jim Bryant wrote: > No matter what Lush Rimbaugh says on the topic, frivilous lawsuits > RARELY win in court. A lawsuit over this would indeed be frivilous. You don't have to win in court, you merely have to exhaust the resources of your opponent. Walnut Creek doesn't have a huge amount of resources, and the amount they're likely to dedicate to defending a case like this is minimal, I suspect. Followups to -chat. -- Ben Rosengart UNIX Systems Engineer, Skunk Group StarMedia Network, Inc. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message