From owner-freebsd-current Sun Aug 26 15:39: 6 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from hawk.mail.pas.earthlink.net (hawk.mail.pas.earthlink.net [207.217.120.22]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E036237B409 for ; Sun, 26 Aug 2001 15:39:01 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from tlambert2@mindspring.com) Received: from mindspring.com (dialup-209.245.135.64.Dial1.SanJose1.Level3.net [209.245.135.64]) by hawk.mail.pas.earthlink.net (EL-8_9_3_3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id PAA29660; Sun, 26 Aug 2001 15:38:55 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <3B897AA9.44FD61CF@mindspring.com> Date: Sun, 26 Aug 2001 15:39:37 -0700 From: Terry Lambert Reply-To: tlambert2@mindspring.com X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en]C-CCK-MCD {Sony} (Win98; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Kris Kennaway Cc: Oliver Fromme , freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Why is csh tcsh? This can be a bad thing... References: <20010826015413.C92548@dragon.nuxi.com> <200108261120.NAA07025@lurza.secnetix.de> <20010826140236.A21698@xor.obsecurity.org> <3B8971BD.1E028F84@mindspring.com> <20010826153121.A32124@xor.obsecurity.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Kris Kennaway wrote: > On Sun, Aug 26, 2001 at 03:01:33PM -0700, Terry Lambert wrote: > > Kris Kennaway wrote: > > > On Sun, Aug 26, 2001 at 01:20:23PM +0200, Oliver Fromme wrote: > > > > "Our" csh still behaves differently like any /bin/csh on > > > > any other system that I know, and can't be easily made to > > > > behave like them. > > > > > > This is an assertion. Where is your supporting evidence? > > > > Hit "TAB"? > > Controllable behaviour. Next? Hit a single "ESC"? PS: "I've got a million of 'em... er, 256 of 'em..." 8-) 8-) -- Terry To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message