From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 25 02:16:56 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 087B616A4CE for ; Tue, 25 Jan 2005 02:16:56 +0000 (GMT) Received: from pi.codefab.com (pi.codefab.com [199.103.21.227]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5F2043D48 for ; Tue, 25 Jan 2005 02:16:55 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pi.codefab.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 451CF5F02; Mon, 24 Jan 2005 21:16:55 -0500 (EST) Received: from pi.codefab.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (pi.codefab.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 46355-07; Mon, 24 Jan 2005 21:16:54 -0500 (EST) Received: from [192.168.1.3] (pool-68-160-236-186.ny325.east.verizon.net [68.160.236.186]) by pi.codefab.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CDD9A5EF6; Mon, 24 Jan 2005 21:16:53 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <41F5AC05.1040500@mac.com> Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2005 21:16:37 -0500 From: Chuck Swiger Organization: The Courts of Chaos User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7.5) Gecko/20041217 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Mervin McDougall References: <20050125020305.70545.qmail@web30908.mail.mud.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <20050125020305.70545.qmail@web30908.mail.mud.yahoo.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.90.0.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at codefab.com cc: freebsd questions Subject: Re: fragmentation X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2005 02:16:56 -0000 Mervin McDougall wrote: > I wanted to know whether it is unusal or is a > problem if when my system starts it indicates that > there is some fragmentation of the files but the file > system is clean and thus it is skipping the fsck. Is > this a bad thing? Is this unusual? No. It's normal. [ Well, excessive fragmentation is a bad thing, but the BSD FFS defragments itself unless the drive is 90+% full, normally you don't need to worry. ] -- -Chuck