From owner-freebsd-jail@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 22 13:15:41 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75DC79A3 for ; Fri, 22 Mar 2013 13:15:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from aimass@yabarana.com) Received: from mail-wg0-x229.google.com (mail-wg0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c00::229]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15E17931 for ; Fri, 22 Mar 2013 13:15:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wg0-f41.google.com with SMTP id ds1so2766818wgb.4 for ; Fri, 22 Mar 2013 06:15:40 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:cc:content-type:x-gm-message-state; bh=ca6qDYPL7Zfk0jQW0ybvuuBX0Z4XQEHx8NTqXoW+dCQ=; b=hUlGKYDa5i4RbU2/iJq9pNRLzoUABJDLeQUSV9JFz/DUcOCDonY/R4VjTlfJdjXFLY tDJ0RrOy6hkyGf1yzi1InrM2+tZgYrAAS1flJQLA+e5EazqxiFC3Vw2SEEfU8Ri8u1BZ LsMNWF325tTmgcIUkgI4lMo6o/7DICQw6PF8GaqRaDLeefxDSqJ6EFHoNX3fILSpe6gP 61Bu/sr2ZW4v0Vu+heFcWuFKI/wlaYpgBGIqYMuWqqUyVvHAW+ryGZB7EO3rUqJAHwFP UJNIkoNusuRj2q4oby7SZsBPq9ifAQ/xR4lXHU8ecu9gdyOfq0yz97bpyRrHpi6KO/j6 cdgA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.180.80.35 with SMTP id o3mr11422865wix.9.1363958140180; Fri, 22 Mar 2013 06:15:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.115.135 with HTTP; Fri, 22 Mar 2013 06:15:40 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20130322220317.A32142@sola.nimnet.asn.au> References: <1UHfYF-000LVV-4Y@internal.tormail.org> <5148980A.1070408@erdgeist.org> <20130321170556.Q32142@sola.nimnet.asn.au> <20130322220317.A32142@sola.nimnet.asn.au> Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2013 09:15:40 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Handbook Jail Chapter rewrite available for critique From: Alejandro Imass To: Ian Smith Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkHVPk6CrUqgCwa62Lx8QLHZc7sO06cQky5shD6DnJT6uX1/rtHID0TF8DemREp65Acbbnn Cc: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org, FreeBSD Questions , sib@tormail.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussion about FreeBSD jail\(8\)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2013 13:15:41 -0000 On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 9:03 AM, Ian Smith wrote: > On Thu, 21 Mar 2013 11:21:29 -0400, Alejandro Imass wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 3:35 AM, Ian Smith wrote: > > > On Tue, 19 Mar 2013 17:53:30 +0100, Dirk Engling wrote: > [...] >> mentioned anywhere in this new proposal and why it isn't mentioned in >> the current handbook either under in section "16.5.2 High-Level >> Administrative Tools in the FreeBSD Ports Collection". If there is >> __any__ tool that should be mentioned in the jails chapter it is [..] > Actually, ezjail has been explicitly mentioned in '16.6 Application of > Jails' http://www.freebsd.org/doc/handbook/jails-application.html since > revision 30226 by danger, Mon May 28 20:02:46 2007 UTC, which section > was just 6 weeks ago updated with a (preceding) similar port reference > to qjail: http://svnweb.freebsd.org/doc?view=revision&revision=40900 > Never seen it before. First time I read about service jails it wasn't there. Further to my point doesn't it make more sense to mention them under "16.5.2 High-Level Administrative Tools in the FreeBSD Ports Collection" or in both places? [...] > > There have been about 20 messages in freebsd-jail@ referring to ezjail > this year so far before this thread, as in previous years; try browsing > the archives from http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-jail/ > I posted on the wrong list then ;-) Subscribing today, thanks! -- Alejandro Imass