Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2016 10:49:35 +0200 From: Ben RUBSON <ben.rubson@gmail.com> To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: HAST + ZFS + NFS + CARP Message-ID: <3851B157-0A0A-4185-B326-0EE5BEAA887A@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20160810131040.GH70364@mordor.lan> References: <20160630144546.GB99997@mordor.lan> <71b8da1e-acb2-9d4e-5d11-20695aa5274a@internetx.com> <AD42D8FD-D07B-454E-B79D-028C1EC57381@gmail.com> <20160630153747.GB5695@mordor.lan> <63C07474-BDD5-42AA-BF4A-85A0E04D3CC2@gmail.com> <678321AB-A9F7-4890-A8C7-E20DFDC69137@gmail.com> <20160630185701.GD5695@mordor.lan> <6035AB85-8E62-4F0A-9FA8-125B31A7A387@gmail.com> <20160810131040.GH70364@mordor.lan>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> On 10 Aug 2016, at 15:10, Julien Cigar <julien@perdition.city> wrote: >=20 > Hello, >=20 > So, after testing ZFS replication with zrep (which works more or less > perfectly) I'm busy to experiment a ZFS + iSCSI solution with two = small > HP DL20 and 2 disks in each. > (...) > Comments ? :) Use one iSCSI target per disk ? (so that if a disk fails, you can easily switch the target down without = impacting the other targets) Use jumbo frames on your replication interfaces ? Give nice GPT labels to your disks ? Ben=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3851B157-0A0A-4185-B326-0EE5BEAA887A>