Date: Mon, 18 May 2015 05:50:18 -0700 From: merlyn@stonehenge.com (Randal L. Schwartz) To: andrew clarke <mail@ozzmosis.com> Cc: John Levine <johnl@iecc.com>, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, jekillen@prodigy.net Subject: Re: Which make? Message-ID: <86mw12yrqt.fsf@red.stonehenge.com> In-Reply-To: <20150518115742.GA42439@ozzmosis.com> (andrew clarke's message of "Mon, 18 May 2015 21:57:42 %2B1000") References: <20150517022324.31995.qmail@ary.lan> <86iobr10s6.fsf@red.stonehenge.com> <20150518115742.GA42439@ozzmosis.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>>>>> "andrew" == andrew clarke <mail@ozzmosis.com> writes:
andrew> I feel the same way about Poudriere, although I was recently caught
andrew> out by the "make config" options changing for the Postfix port (see
andrew> 20150510 in UPDATING), which meant my options were reset to the
andrew> defaults. :/
That's why I have this script:
#!/bin/sh
poudriere ports -u &&
poudriere options -f /usr/local/etc/poudriere.d/origins
forces "make config" on everything I build every time I fetch new ports.
--
Randal L. Schwartz - Stonehenge Consulting Services, Inc. - +1 503 777 0095
<merlyn@stonehenge.com> <URL:http://www.stonehenge.com/merlyn/>;
Perl/Unix consulting, Technical writing, Comedy, etc. etc.
Still trying to think of something clever for the fourth line of this .sig
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?86mw12yrqt.fsf>