From owner-freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 30 01:10:03 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-sparc64@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7179E1065676 for ; Wed, 30 Dec 2009 01:10:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F6F78FC13 for ; Wed, 30 Dec 2009 01:10:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id nBU1A39h016238 for ; Wed, 30 Dec 2009 01:10:03 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id nBU1A3pv016237; Wed, 30 Dec 2009 01:10:03 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Wed, 30 Dec 2009 01:10:03 GMT Message-Id: <200912300110.nBU1A3pv016237@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.org From: Marius Strobl Cc: Subject: Re: sparc64/142102: FreeBSD 8.0 kernel panics on sparc64 when accessing NFS X-BeenThere: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Marius Strobl List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the Sparc List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Dec 2009 01:10:03 -0000 The following reply was made to PR sparc64/142102; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Marius Strobl To: Manuel Tobias Schiller Cc: Mark Linimon , FreeBSD-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: sparc64/142102: FreeBSD 8.0 kernel panics on sparc64 when accessing NFS Date: Wed, 30 Dec 2009 02:08:01 +0100 On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 01:25:55AM +0100, Manuel Tobias Schiller wrote: > On Tue, 29 Dec 2009 19:53:58 +0100 > Marius Strobl wrote: > > Oh, sorry, I had a bug in there, the svc code used a stale > > pointer to the mbuf with this. Could you please re-fetch > > and try again? I can't guarantee that this fixes the hang > > you experienced but at least in theory just re-aligning > > the data can't make the issue with the unaligned access > > any worse. Using the LOM or by breaking into the kernel > > by sending a break you should be able to power-cycle/ > > reboot the machine without removing the power cord should > > it hang again though. > > What NFS client and with which mount options are you > > using to trigger is problem? > > > > Marius > > I managed to compile and test a kernel with your updated patch, and things > seem to work. I'll try to stress-test it over the night by copying a few > tens of gigabytes over and report back with the results. Also, if I'm > reading your patch correctly, we should be able to do without the bcopy > hack from PR 140797, so I'll recompile a kernel without it and try if that > works as well. I don't think so; nfs_realign() only guarantees 4-byte alignment as required by XDR and assumed by nfsm_srvmtofh_xx() further down the road but nfsfh_t needs 8-byte alignment. > > Thanks a lot for all your help and your patience! > Well, thanks a lot for testing so far! Marius