From owner-freebsd-ports  Tue Jun 24 00:09:44 1997
Return-Path: <owner-ports>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id AAA29145
          for ports-outgoing; Tue, 24 Jun 1997 00:09:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from bourbon.sfc.wide.ad.jp (bourbon.sfc.wide.ad.jp [203.178.139.171])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id AAA29140
          for <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>; Tue, 24 Jun 1997 00:09:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from bourbon.sfc.wide.ad.jp (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by bourbon.sfc.wide.ad.jp (8.8.5/3.5Wpl104/21/97) with ESMTP id QAA03346; Tue, 24 Jun 1997 16:07:09 +0900 (JST)
Message-Id: <199706240707.QAA03346@bourbon.sfc.wide.ad.jp>
To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Cc: max@wide.ad.jp
Subject: ghostscript3
From: Masafumi NAKANE/=?ISO-2022-JP?B?GyRCQ2Y6LDJtSjgbKEI=?= <max@wide.ad.jp>
X-Mailer: Mew version 1.54 on Emacs 19.28.1, Mule 2.3
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date: Tue, 24 Jun 1997 16:07:09 +0900
Sender: owner-ports@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

I just noticed that the ghostscript-3.53.tar.gz file is no longer on
the master_site.

Do we need to keep this port?

     Cheers,
Max