From owner-freebsd-pkg@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 13 22:16:35 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: pkg@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0753E117 for ; Mon, 13 Apr 2015 22:16:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wi0-x22e.google.com (mail-wi0-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c05::22e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 883C9EF for ; Mon, 13 Apr 2015 22:16:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wizk4 with SMTP id k4so90936144wiz.1 for ; Mon, 13 Apr 2015 15:16:33 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=iQfoLdY/m46c4nPioqd1g1tENZCnwVYo31k/I8UYiRM=; b=AVsm8KyTwWyXBSIuBOIBoxL5qxDw62yv2j83b8bhYLX+HZ3O8Y/02cObyTSfB+Wnjf FFzMcqL4uvCcjyNpqnBci/2vlR66DTbKDWCt5n5usNnFgmPEly9hwzaRg9hjdLxWtYDu +UUCVJdXwuZ2YwPG1j1s3FjTuOnSsfM4Td6gk/3DJql3UQ8lX0stxYE1x28JESlN+T++ 0v757Zx2fdc0MVS1kH10abQklGPbCxMdhh3saVfUrhp+MpMpJTg1pngZxJcmeoERuyBA kDS5O3YFzpV4csCzIwRcLRy3UgrrQhhyQJJuLYZtkLSZYmIbzPI7mvXXSzv/4Y3NSG5O DBkA== X-Received: by 10.180.7.196 with SMTP id l4mr25355761wia.44.1428963393128; Mon, 13 Apr 2015 15:16:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ivaldir.etoilebsd.net ([2001:41d0:8:db4c::1]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id ev7sm13234735wjb.47.2015.04.13.15.16.31 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 13 Apr 2015 15:16:32 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Baptiste Daroussin Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2015 00:16:30 +0200 From: Baptiste Daroussin To: Adam McDougall Cc: pkg@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: [CFT] Call for testing pkg 1.5.0 Message-ID: <20150413221629.GA39658@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> References: <20150331190323.GF30115@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> <551EACA7.8060008@egr.msu.edu> <20150403151334.GK30115@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> <552C2175.8020606@egr.msu.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="MGYHOYXEY6WxJCY8" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <552C2175.8020606@egr.msu.edu> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-BeenThere: freebsd-pkg@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Binary package management and package tools discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2015 22:16:35 -0000 --MGYHOYXEY6WxJCY8 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 04:05:09PM -0400, Adam McDougall wrote: > On 04/03/2015 11:13, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > > On Fri, Apr 03, 2015 at 11:07:19AM -0400, Adam McDougall wrote: > >> On 03/31/2015 15:03, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > >>> Hi all, > >>> > >>> We just released pkg 1.5.0 beta1 (in ports-mgmt/pkg-devel), > >>> > >>> Please test and report as much bugs as you can! > >>> We could be very grateful if regressions tests could be provided alon= g with the > >>> bug reports :) > >>> > >>> Plan is to release 1.5.0 as soon as possible > >>> > >>> Best regards, > >>> Bapt > >>> > >> > >> When the rapid cycle of bugreport-> fix slows down in the RC stage, > >> could you give a heads up and ETA before final release (2-3 weeks?) > >> I will probably be out of town for this release but my inclinations to > >> test are rising. In the past, the final release came very quickly aft= er > >> a number of reported bugs were fixed. Fortunately 1.4.0 was good. I > >> feel the late RC stage needs a short announced period of a week or more > >> to let risk-averse testers know that it is worthwhile to start testing > >> without concern of almost daily fixes. Thanks. > >> > >=20 > > My hope is 2 weeks we have added lots of regressions tests (which is st= ill not > > enough) so I'm a little bit more confident than I use to be. > >=20 > > Of course I will delay the release if the amount of bugs reported is too > > important. > >=20 > > I suspect more people will test during the Week End to depending on the= feedback > > of this week end I may release the RC1 on monday/tuesday and then depen= ding on > > the feedback of the next week a final release could happen on next wedn= esday > > (14th.). > >=20 > > Best regards, > > Bapt > >=20 >=20 > I have been testing 1.4.99.19 and 1.4.99.20 over the weekend on a couple > desktop installs and so far it works fine. I think I noticed a new > behavior, it seems to print multiple warnings when a dependency library > is locked (for testing). I think pkg 1.4.12 only prints it once. If > multiple are intentional, could it print the name of the package causing > it? It does not seem to prevent upgrade of any leaf packages which > seems improper. I went ahead with the upgrade, verified 'pkg upgrade' > reports nothing, unlocked gtk3, then it offered to upgrade just gtk3. I > don't know if it would be different if a shlib version changed. I can > redo this test and/or provide more data but I only have today and > tomorrow. Thanks. >=20 Yes it is planned to bring more informations to users, but that would be too intrusive changes internally to get added to pkg 1.5 at this time before the release. I hope to bring that for 1.6 Best regards, Bapt --MGYHOYXEY6WxJCY8 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iEYEARECAAYFAlUsQD0ACgkQ8kTtMUmk6Ez/AQCePX2EoVWHSqxhCYaq+7x/V62s txMAniJirnz6ZfJicnV3OJaKpQIh5Dqq =m85Y -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --MGYHOYXEY6WxJCY8--