Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2015 00:16:30 +0200 From: Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@FreeBSD.org> To: Adam McDougall <mcdouga9@egr.msu.edu> Cc: pkg@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: [CFT] Call for testing pkg 1.5.0 Message-ID: <20150413221629.GA39658@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> In-Reply-To: <552C2175.8020606@egr.msu.edu> References: <20150331190323.GF30115@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> <551EACA7.8060008@egr.msu.edu> <20150403151334.GK30115@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> <552C2175.8020606@egr.msu.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--MGYHOYXEY6WxJCY8 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 04:05:09PM -0400, Adam McDougall wrote: > On 04/03/2015 11:13, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > > On Fri, Apr 03, 2015 at 11:07:19AM -0400, Adam McDougall wrote: > >> On 03/31/2015 15:03, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > >>> Hi all, > >>> > >>> We just released pkg 1.5.0 beta1 (in ports-mgmt/pkg-devel), > >>> > >>> Please test and report as much bugs as you can! > >>> We could be very grateful if regressions tests could be provided alon= g with the > >>> bug reports :) > >>> > >>> Plan is to release 1.5.0 as soon as possible > >>> > >>> Best regards, > >>> Bapt > >>> > >> > >> When the rapid cycle of bugreport-> fix slows down in the RC stage, > >> could you give a heads up and ETA before final release (2-3 weeks?) > >> I will probably be out of town for this release but my inclinations to > >> test are rising. In the past, the final release came very quickly aft= er > >> a number of reported bugs were fixed. Fortunately 1.4.0 was good. I > >> feel the late RC stage needs a short announced period of a week or more > >> to let risk-averse testers know that it is worthwhile to start testing > >> without concern of almost daily fixes. Thanks. > >> > >=20 > > My hope is 2 weeks we have added lots of regressions tests (which is st= ill not > > enough) so I'm a little bit more confident than I use to be. > >=20 > > Of course I will delay the release if the amount of bugs reported is too > > important. > >=20 > > I suspect more people will test during the Week End to depending on the= feedback > > of this week end I may release the RC1 on monday/tuesday and then depen= ding on > > the feedback of the next week a final release could happen on next wedn= esday > > (14th.). > >=20 > > Best regards, > > Bapt > >=20 >=20 > I have been testing 1.4.99.19 and 1.4.99.20 over the weekend on a couple > desktop installs and so far it works fine. I think I noticed a new > behavior, it seems to print multiple warnings when a dependency library > is locked (for testing). I think pkg 1.4.12 only prints it once. If > multiple are intentional, could it print the name of the package causing > it? It does not seem to prevent upgrade of any leaf packages which > seems improper. I went ahead with the upgrade, verified 'pkg upgrade' > reports nothing, unlocked gtk3, then it offered to upgrade just gtk3. I > don't know if it would be different if a shlib version changed. I can > redo this test and/or provide more data but I only have today and > tomorrow. Thanks. >=20 Yes it is planned to bring more informations to users, but that would be too intrusive changes internally to get added to pkg 1.5 at this time before the release. I hope to bring that for 1.6 Best regards, Bapt --MGYHOYXEY6WxJCY8 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iEYEARECAAYFAlUsQD0ACgkQ8kTtMUmk6Ez/AQCePX2EoVWHSqxhCYaq+7x/V62s txMAniJirnz6ZfJicnV3OJaKpQIh5Dqq =m85Y -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --MGYHOYXEY6WxJCY8--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20150413221629.GA39658>