From owner-freebsd-bugs Thu Aug 10 01:30:18 1995 Return-Path: bugs-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.FreeBSD.org (8.6.11/8.6.6) id BAA24533 for bugs-outgoing; Thu, 10 Aug 1995 01:30:18 -0700 Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.FreeBSD.org (8.6.11/8.6.6) id BAA24525 ; Thu, 10 Aug 1995 01:30:07 -0700 Date: Thu, 10 Aug 1995 01:30:07 -0700 Message-Id: <199508100830.BAA24525@freefall.FreeBSD.org> To: freebsd-bugs Cc: From: J Wunsch Subject: Re: Re: kern/662: LINT kernel config line for for parallel port doesn't work Reply-To: J Wunsch Sender: bugs-owner@FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk The following reply was made to PR kern/662; it has been noted by GNATS. From: J Wunsch To: muir@idiom.com (David Muir Sharnoff) Cc: joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de, FreeBSD-gnats-submit@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Re: kern/662: LINT kernel config line for for parallel port doesn't work Date: Thu, 10 Aug 1995 08:22:41 +0200 (MET DST) As David Muir Sharnoff wrote: > > If there is some utility in what the LINT kernel does, then I would > request that there be comment in there explaining the > difference so that other people who build kernel configs from the > LINT kernel rather than the (rather stripped) GENERIC kernel > don't run into the same problem. The LINT kernel should probably mention both, the `port?' and the explicit port address variants. -- cheers, J"org joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de -- http://www.sax.de/~joerg/ Never trust an operating system you don't have sources for. ;-)