From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 12 22:04:54 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A36A16A41C; Tue, 12 Jul 2005 22:04:54 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from emaste@phaedrus.sandvine.ca) Received: from mailserver.sandvine.com (sandvine.com [199.243.201.138]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EFC1043D46; Tue, 12 Jul 2005 22:04:53 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from emaste@phaedrus.sandvine.ca) Received: from labgw2.phaedrus.sandvine.com ([192.168.3.11]) by mailserver.sandvine.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6713); Tue, 12 Jul 2005 18:04:52 -0400 Received: by labgw2.phaedrus.sandvine.com (Postfix, from userid 12627) id BBD1D1361E; Tue, 12 Jul 2005 18:04:52 -0400 (EDT) Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2005 18:04:52 -0400 From: Ed Maste To: Robert Watson Message-ID: <20050712220452.GB38249@sandvine.com> References: <42CEF0EB.4000107@borderware.com> <42D006DB.8080108@errno.com> <20050712150224.GA38249@sandvine.com> <20050712162332.Q79478@fledge.watson.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050712162332.Q79478@fledge.watson.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-OriginalArrivalTime: 12 Jul 2005 22:04:52.0911 (UTC) FILETIME=[BAEA1BF0:01C5872D] Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: what to replace splnet in FreeBSD 5.x? X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2005 22:04:54 -0000 On Tue, Jul 12, 2005 at 04:30:18PM +0100, Robert Watson wrote: > I'm concerned about the multicast address list problems you've been > experiencing, but haven't yet had a chance to investigate. If you could > provide a code fragment that exercises this problem, that would probably > get me started a lot more quickly. Thanks Robert. So far we've reproduced it only within our test lab environment and with our product executables -- a large amount of code and infrastructure. I've attempted to reduce it to a small amount of code that demonstrates the problem but have had no success yet. -- Ed Maste, Sandvine Incorporated