From owner-freebsd-x11@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 25 07:27:43 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D5ED16A4CE for ; Fri, 25 Feb 2005 07:27:43 +0000 (GMT) Received: from niobe.ijs.si (mail.ijs.si [193.2.4.66]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93D7143D67 for ; Fri, 25 Feb 2005 07:27:42 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dejan.lesjak@ijs.si) Received: from localhost (localhost.ijs.si [127.0.0.1]) by niobe.ijs.si (Postfix) with ESMTP id C59CC1DD436; Fri, 25 Feb 2005 08:27:41 +0100 (CET) Received: from niobe.ijs.si ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (niobe.ijs.si [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 40432-15-2; Fri, 25 Feb 2005 08:27:28 +0100 (CET) Received: from metatron.ijs.si (metatron.ijs.si [193.2.4.152]) by niobe.ijs.si (Postfix) with ESMTP id A79231DD667; Fri, 25 Feb 2005 08:27:28 +0100 (CET) Received: from idefix.ijs.si (idefix.ijs.si [193.2.4.33]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by metatron.ijs.si (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A8321C00715; Fri, 25 Feb 2005 08:27:28 +0100 (CET) From: Dejan Lesjak To: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2005 08:27:27 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.7.2 References: <20050221014454.GA55172@xor.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <20050221014454.GA55172@xor.obsecurity.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200502250827.28069.dejan.lesjak@ijs.si> X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ijs.si cc: Kris Kennaway Subject: Re: NO_LATEST_LINK in imake-6 X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2005 07:27:43 -0000 On Monday 21 of February 2005 02:44, Kris Kennaway wrote: > Should the NO_LATEST_LINK in devel/imake-6 be removed? It's not going > to conflict with imake-4 since only one of those packages is built on > any given branch. Sure, I'll remove it then :) Dejan