Date: Sun, 14 Mar 2004 23:35:47 -0500 (EST) From: Daniel Eischen <eischen@vigrid.com> To: Mike Silbersack <silby@silby.com> Cc: threads@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Mutex unlock failure: ? Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.10.10403142335020.12209-100000@pcnet5.pcnet.com> In-Reply-To: <20040314204754.I19819@odysseus.silby.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, 14 Mar 2004, Mike Silbersack wrote: > > On Sun, 14 Mar 2004, Mike Silbersack wrote: > > > And when I check in top, uic is just eating cpu time. Is this possibly > > some thread bug? I haven't recompiled X11 in quite a while, so it was > > probably built against libc_r, not libpthread. (I'm using libmap to remap > > libc_r to libpthread, FWIW.) > > > > Is that mutex unlock failure message something from libpthread? Is this a > > known bug of some sort in X11 or libpthread? > > > > Thanks, > > > > Mike "Silby" Silbersack > > Hrm, looks like uic is part of qt, not X11. So that rules out libc_r > interference. > > Can someone else try building kdepim with libpthread and see what happens? I built kdepim-3.2.0_1 a week or two ago and it built fine (libc_r -> libpthread). -- Dan Eischen
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.GSO.4.10.10403142335020.12209-100000>