Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2004 18:34:46 -0500 From: Adam Weinberger <adamw@FreeBSD.org> To: Joe Marcus Clarke <marcus@marcuscom.com> Cc: FreeBSD GNOME Users <gnome@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: gnomevfs2 and gnomevfs-extras Message-ID: <20040206233446.GS3365@toxic.magnesium.net> In-Reply-To: <1076108862.767.11.camel@gyros> References: <20040206205133.GM3365@toxic.magnesium.net> <opr2yv7chy8ckrg5@smtp.central.cox.net> <20040206230104.GR3365@toxic.magnesium.net> <1076108862.767.11.camel@gyros>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>> (02.06.2004 @ 1807 PST): Joe Marcus Clarke said, in 4.6K: << > This will happen if libsambaclient is installed on the system when > gnomevfs2 is built. I think we should add --enable-samba=no to > gnomevfs2, and let users that want Samba support build gnomevfs-extras. > Thoughts? > > Joe >> end of "Re: gnomevfs2 and gnomevfs-extras" from Joe Marcus Clarke << Well, I mean, there are scenarios where this could conceptually lead to stuff not getting installed when it's supposed to. It's nothing major, but I think it's something we should do. However, I do not know why libsambaclient was installed at that point. I should have looked at the logs more closely. We'll see what happens with this run (a 2.4 build). # Adam -- Adam Weinberger adam@vectors.cx // adamw@FreeBSD.org // adamw@magnesium.net http://www.vectors.cx
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040206233446.GS3365>