From owner-freebsd-embedded@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 28 12:50:01 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-embedded@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B8F61065670 for ; Wed, 28 Dec 2011 12:50:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from adrian.chadd@gmail.com) Received: from mail-vw0-f54.google.com (mail-vw0-f54.google.com [209.85.212.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5C6D8FC15 for ; Wed, 28 Dec 2011 12:50:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: by vbbfr13 with SMTP id fr13so17140042vbb.13 for ; Wed, 28 Dec 2011 04:50:00 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=G2WS4YPMbRONKnW8gM+9ZokDrl+lq5OpCJzFY60N1lk=; b=Acikh0fnax6NbVvbOrJO1bktobHOEU+wdDclHvrYNw+VHYOAo3diOzKJrVIG9oa62I WGFUgH7frSXjIfTayy/bQT/iY2ziulQMwQ9IQD8QrB8ADJDY9v1xQFN9CaFzxJf52HJP fLAWjZun1eeaxzLJI89W4bMKRNKRg+cOcv9y4= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.52.33.99 with SMTP id q3mr15138130vdi.100.1325076600136; Wed, 28 Dec 2011 04:50:00 -0800 (PST) Sender: adrian.chadd@gmail.com Received: by 10.52.36.5 with HTTP; Wed, 28 Dec 2011 04:50:00 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <12538AED-175C-4B1E-BF05-6FD05D14CE70@lassitu.de> References: <0F6CC18F-6973-42A2-AC03-F01BF59458AE@lassitu.de> <1100F70E-9DA9-4163-AC9A-423ECE5AA9A3@lassitu.de> <18CABB46-9B9A-41CB-8742-6723C5FF4D67@lassitu.de> <2CBD8651-E132-49DC-A082-37A8F5C626EA@bsdimp.com> <45529EC2-73BE-4F69-A9BE-E22D9FEAADD7@lassitu.de> <267FB3D6-830E-4A2F-8C1C-A96873EDCD31@lassitu.de> <12538AED-175C-4B1E-BF05-6FD05D14CE70@lassitu.de> Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2011 04:50:00 -0800 X-Google-Sender-Auth: z-ulXVTTaKdDfEyxqXeATASmUrs Message-ID: From: Adrian Chadd To: Stefan Bethke Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: "freebsd-embedded@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: Updated switch/glue patch? X-BeenThere: freebsd-embedded@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Dedicated and Embedded Systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2011 12:50:01 -0000 Hi, Ok, can you then please send me an updated diff which: * renames *_lockheld() to *_locked(), just for consistency with the kernel; * rename smi_mtx back to sc_mtx, just for consistency; * add _LOCK, _UNLOCK, _LOCK_ASSERT, _UNLOCK_ASSERT macros; * use those to enforce correct locking. :) Let's do that. We'll then worry about the callout mutex use afterwards. Adrian