From owner-freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Mon Jun 13 10:24:04 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A7F4AF1371 for ; Mon, 13 Jun 2016 10:24:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from 000.fbsd@quip.cz) Received: from elsa.codelab.cz (elsa.codelab.cz [94.124.105.4]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C51132213 for ; Mon, 13 Jun 2016 10:24:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from 000.fbsd@quip.cz) Received: from elsa.codelab.cz (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by elsa.codelab.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6784C28433; Mon, 13 Jun 2016 12:14:31 +0200 (CEST) Received: from illbsd.quip.test (ip-86-49-16-209.net.upcbroadband.cz [86.49.16.209]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by elsa.codelab.cz (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2106A2840C; Mon, 13 Jun 2016 12:14:30 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <575E8785.4000203@quip.cz> Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2016 12:14:29 +0200 From: Miroslav Lachman <000.fbsd@quip.cz> User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:35.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/35.0 SeaMonkey/2.32 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Cy Schubert , freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Illumos/OpenSolaris SMF to FreeBSD References: <201606101723.u5AHNx4U060934@slippy.cwsent.com> In-Reply-To: <201606101723.u5AHNx4U060934@slippy.cwsent.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2016 10:24:04 -0000 Cy Schubert wrote on 06/10/2016 19:23: > Hi, > > What are people's thoughts about porting Illumos Service Management > Facility (SMF) to FreeBSD? The Solaris SMF didn't replace their init(8), > it's started by their init(8) through inittab -- we could use ttys or > replace init. > > Like DTrace and ZFS, SMF is CDDL. Does that matter? There are some work on port of Launchd / ReLaunchd (jobd) / Open Launchd / nosh etc. https://wiki.freebsd.org/launchd https://github.com/mheily/jobd https://github.com/freebsd/openlaunchd https://www.freebsd.org/news/status/report-2015-07-2015-09.html#The-nosh-Project I personally prefer nosh but "anything" should be better than current state. Miroslav Lachman