From owner-freebsd-performance@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 22 21:36:01 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E5AB16A401 for ; Wed, 22 Mar 2006 21:36:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from g_jin@lbl.gov) Received: from smtp114.sbc.mail.mud.yahoo.com (smtp114.sbc.mail.mud.yahoo.com [68.142.198.213]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9807743D5F for ; Wed, 22 Mar 2006 21:36:00 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from g_jin@lbl.gov) Received: (qmail 5482 invoked from network); 22 Mar 2006 21:36:00 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.2.10?) (jinmtb@sbcglobal.net@68.127.178.44 with plain) by smtp114.sbc.mail.mud.yahoo.com with SMTP; 22 Mar 2006 21:35:59 -0000 Message-ID: <4421C392.1080306@lbl.gov> Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2006 13:37:22 -0800 From: "Jin Guojun [VFFS]" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.7.5) Gecko/20050108 X-Accept-Language: zh, zh-CN, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Chris Howells References: <20060322185241.98216.qmail@web30312.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <200603221932.44334.howells@kde.org> In-Reply-To: <200603221932.44334.howells@kde.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailman-Approved-At: Thu, 23 Mar 2006 03:01:10 +0000 Cc: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org Subject: Re: packet drop with intel gigabit / marwell gigabit X-BeenThere: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Performance/tuning List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2006 21:36:01 -0000 Chris Howells wrote: >On Wednesday 22 March 2006 18:52, Arne Woerner wrote: > > > >>It is an ECS K7VMM or K7VMM+ if I recall it correctly... Bought in >>2003... >> >>Is it easy to explain, why the 266FSB cannot do 8Gbit/sec without >>problem? I mean: 2*133MHz*32bit=8.3125Gbit/sec... Is the MMU too >>slow (e. g. due to "cheap" implementation of cache strategies) to >>utilize the FSB to the maximum? >> Can be everywhere, but it is most likely in north bridge design. >>I'd be tempted to blame the Via chipset. >> >> K7VMM is an older motherboard than A7V8X, and it has similar chipset as A7V8X. From Arne's test, it seems to have better memory bandwidth than A7V8X. In past, VIA designed some good chipset. It is behind others now, but it may have other features we do not know / use. -Jin