Date: Sun, 22 Mar 2020 22:42:02 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 197923] [patch] [sched] Fix comment in sched_balance_pair and move load check ahead of lock Message-ID: <bug-197923-227-D4CYGhcfh4@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-197923-227@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-197923-227@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D197923 --- Comment #11 from Harrison Grundy <harrison.grundy@astrodoggroup.com> --- (In reply to Mark Johnston from comment #10) Right, but it seems like locking the tdq to "force" them into alignment wou= ld have a bigger impact on performance than occassionally mis-balancing. If we take the lock, and push a new thread onto the target, or pull one from the source, when they're waiting on the lock somewhere else, the end result wou= ld still be incorrect, wouldn't it? --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-197923-227-D4CYGhcfh4>