From owner-freebsd-questions Wed Jul 12 20: 2:30 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from vindaloo.allsolutions.com.au (vindaloo.allsolutions.com.au [203.111.24.54]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E90B37C0B5 for ; Wed, 12 Jul 2000 20:02:26 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from David_May@allsolutions.com.au) Received: from ASPerth1.allsolutions.com.au (aspns.internal [192.9.200.250]) by vindaloo.allsolutions.com.au (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id LAA03476 for ; Thu, 13 Jul 2000 11:02:19 +0800 (WST) (envelope-from David_May@allsolutions.com.au) Received: by ASPerth1.allsolutions.com.au(Lotus SMTP MTA v1.2 (600.1 3-26-1998)) id 4825691B.0010C394 ; Thu, 13 Jul 2000 11:03:06 +0800 X-Lotus-FromDomain: ALL SOLUTIONS From: "David May" To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Message-ID: <4825691B.000CD6D1.00@ASPerth1.allsolutions.com.au> Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2000 11:03:01 +0800 Subject: [Q] Problem configuring User PPP NAT options. Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I have a FreeBSD server connected to the Internet and my own private network. I have added a dial-up line to connect to another private network using User PPP. The remote PPP server allocates the local and remote IP addresses when the link is up and the addresses are static. Unfortunately the the remote server assigns IP addresses which conflict with public addresses assigned to well-known institution. Other hosts on the remote network also conflict. I have already used the "enable nat" option but that does not prevent the local and remote addresses assigned by the remote PPP server from appearing in my routing table. Can I somehow use the NAT features in User PPP to solve this problem? An example would help. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message