From owner-freebsd-scsi Mon Sep 23 13:47:37 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D001837B401; Mon, 23 Sep 2002 13:47:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from odin.ac.hmc.edu (Odin.AC.HMC.Edu [134.173.32.75]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4431343E42; Mon, 23 Sep 2002 13:47:35 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from brdavis@odin.ac.hmc.edu) Received: from odin.ac.hmc.edu (IDENT:brdavis@localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by odin.ac.hmc.edu (8.12.3/8.12.3) with ESMTP id g8NKlVj1016615; Mon, 23 Sep 2002 13:47:31 -0700 Received: (from brdavis@localhost) by odin.ac.hmc.edu (8.12.3/8.12.3/Submit) id g8NKlV7F016614; Mon, 23 Sep 2002 13:47:31 -0700 Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2002 13:47:31 -0700 From: Brooks Davis To: Matthew Jacob Cc: Brooks Davis , Matt Jacob , scsi@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/cam/scsi scsi_all.c Message-ID: <20020923134731.A14701@Odin.AC.HMC.Edu> References: <20020923132415.A24262@Odin.AC.HMC.Edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-md5; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="cWoXeonUoKmBZSoM" Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i In-Reply-To: ; from mjacob@feral.com on Mon, Sep 23, 2002 at 01:37:39PM -0700 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-milter (http://amavis.org/) on odin.ac.hmc.edu Sender: owner-freebsd-scsi@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org --cWoXeonUoKmBZSoM Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Sep 23, 2002 at 01:37:39PM -0700, Matthew Jacob wrote: >=20 > On Mon, 23 Sep 2002, Brooks Davis wrote: >=20 > > If we're going to allow 0 we should probably also allow values between > > 0 and 100 as well and just toss the checks. I don't really object to > > letting the user take aim at their foot if that's what they want to do. >=20 > You don't understand the real issue, which is that delaying after a bus > reset is an SPI-only issue, and one that is not encapsulated in any spec > in any hard and fast way- so don't talk bout 'aiming at foot' unless it > the thing you're aiming happens to be your nourishment mandibiles. I don't think I ever claimed I did understand it. I addressed an existing annoyance without changing the default behavior one bit. If there's not reason for the lower bounds checks then let's get rid of them entierly. If there is a reason for them, then we can leave them in (after making them consistant again). It just seems really odd to me that we would allow values in the range of {0, 100-INTMAX}. -- Brooks --=20 Any statement of the form "X is the one, true Y" is FALSE. PGP fingerprint 655D 519C 26A7 82E7 2529 9BF0 5D8E 8BE9 F238 1AD4 --cWoXeonUoKmBZSoM Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQE9j33iXY6L6fI4GtQRAuWCAJ45uZQzyHvniBZVW8my0BbDW22YiQCfR+qe N4Oy0SE2/3rtOWPwG7CBvp4= =fLSH -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --cWoXeonUoKmBZSoM-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-scsi" in the body of the message