Date: Tue, 07 Feb 2012 19:24:05 +0100 From: Dirk Engling <erdgeist@erdgeist.org> Cc: freebsd-rc@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Proposal ipv6_addrs_common Message-ID: <4F316C45.2090907@erdgeist.org> In-Reply-To: <20120208.005441.344732308200260953.hrs@allbsd.org> References: <20120207.170255.161251905285915806.hrs@allbsd.org> <20120207.232417.487789017555472392.hrs@allbsd.org> <4F31406D.5020304@erdgeist.org> <20120208.005441.344732308200260953.hrs@allbsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 07.02.12 16:54, Hiroki Sato wrote: > Yes, after integrating address range expansion it is possible and > it should be. I am sorry to keep bugging you, is there any chance to have the patches back ported to 8.x as well (of course with me volunteering to do the porting)? I noticed that in 9.0 network.subr got a neat cleanup and I wonder what the policies regarding back porting changes are. Whom to petition to? erdgeist -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (Darwin) iEYEARECAAYFAk8xbEUACgkQuN1wFypsMNNSyQCdFDMNdiES0QmoJTnEd3O3cvwv TPoAoJVE++FOuRYyvhIgmlqGFORkhy7b =9eYn -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4F316C45.2090907>