Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 1 Oct 2022 14:50:48 -0700
From:      Mark Millard <marklmi@yahoo.com>
To:        bob prohaska <fbsd@www.zefox.net>
Cc:        freebsd-arm <freebsd-arm@freebsd.org>, freebsd-uboot@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: u-boot debug, was: Re: U-boot on RPI3, sees disk but won't boot it
Message-ID:  <DDCDC4AC-FF23-44FD-8FFC-3CE7A9FEA5E5@yahoo.com>
In-Reply-To: <20221001212155.GA98793@www.zefox.net>
References:  <20220928234341.GA77046@www.zefox.net> <20220929002131.GA77106@www.zefox.net> <197D3C46-063B-4C67-AB1A-A3A072521D7F@yahoo.com> <A8C2BA4E-4520-4B34-9614-DDC4D8BEB097@yahoo.com> <6AA65AE6-41F1-405F-A592-7D641EA4C9CF@yahoo.com> <E3A1C678-8C47-4283-9F9F-4C9011DB8A2B@yahoo.com> <20221001174724.GA98055@www.zefox.net> <ABFDD634-5CB6-4DAE-B4DE-629CE7E4FE06@yahoo.com> <20221001193033.GA98348@www.zefox.net> <46226720-D867-4AD3-9559-A4365FAC28C4@yahoo.com> <20221001212155.GA98793@www.zefox.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 2022-Oct-1, at 14:21, bob prohaska <fbsd@www.zefox.net> wrote:

> On Sat, Oct 01, 2022 at 12:58:00PM -0700, Mark Millard wrote:
>> 
>> What you report for behavior below suggests that you got
>> an appropriate u-boot.bin in place.
>> 
> 
> That's a relief!
> 
>> 
>> Given the "no failures to find a boot device",
>> I suggest an experiment of (temporarily?)
>> reverting to the official rpi_arm64_fragment
>> (to disable the U-Boot logging) and seeing how
>> it behaves without the extra messages.
>> 
> 
> Done, using a copy of rpi_arm64_fragment from
> another FreeBSD box that's dated April 5th.
> I didn't think it'd be that old, hope not!
> 
> Out of 14 boot attempts, about 7 ended in loops.
> Only two shutdown -r now attempts succeeded. The
> transcipt is at
> http://nemesis.zefox.com/~fbsd/pelorus_console.txt7_orig_fragment
> 
> I'll resume experiments in the morning after checking email.

I had sent a note about that file still showing
debug output. The experiment needs to have
no debug output but to have the 3 mdelay(...)
calls in question in place. Anything else is
a different type of test.

So you can look in files generated to see if
the debug output had been avoided. (The
status of the mdelay's is less obvious.)


===
Mark Millard
marklmi at yahoo.com




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?DDCDC4AC-FF23-44FD-8FFC-3CE7A9FEA5E5>