From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Oct 27 08:25:02 2004
Return-Path: <owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 1183616A4CE; Wed, 27 Oct 2004 08:25:02 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from gw.catspoiler.org (217-ip-163.nccn.net [209.79.217.163])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id BA49F43D41; Wed, 27 Oct 2004 08:25:01 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from truckman@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from FreeBSD.org (mousie.catspoiler.org [192.168.101.2])
	by gw.catspoiler.org (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id i9R8OqGc019841;
	Wed, 27 Oct 2004 01:24:56 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from truckman@FreeBSD.org)
Message-Id: <200410270824.i9R8OqGc019841@gw.catspoiler.org>
Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2004 01:24:52 -0700 (PDT)
From: Don Lewis <truckman@FreeBSD.org>
To: phk@FreeBSD.org
In-Reply-To: <200410270805.i9R853Wb066467@repoman.freebsd.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/plain; charset=us-ascii
cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org
cc: src-committers@FreeBSD.org
cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/kern vfs_subr.c src/sys/sys buf.h bufobj.h
 vnode.h
X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: CVS commit messages for the entire tree <cvs-all.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all>,
	<mailto:cvs-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/cvs-all>
List-Post: <mailto:cvs-all@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cvs-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all>,
	<mailto:cvs-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2004 08:25:02 -0000

On 27 Oct, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> phk         2004-10-27 08:05:03 UTC
> 
>   FreeBSD src repository
> 
>   Modified files:
>     sys/kern             vfs_subr.c 
>     sys/sys              buf.h bufobj.h vnode.h 
>   Log:
>   Move the syncer linkage from vnode to bufobj.
>   
>   This is not quite a perfect separation: the syncer still think it knows
>   that everything is a vnode.

This change strikes me as wrong.  The syncer has to handle things like
inode timestamps (utimes(2)) and fifos, which I wouldn't expect to have
bufobjs.