From owner-freebsd-ports  Sat Apr  7  7:40: 5 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@hub.freebsd.org
Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE24637B422
	for <freebsd-ports@hub.freebsd.org>; Sat,  7 Apr 2001 07:40:01 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org)
Received: (from gnats@localhost)
	by freefall.freebsd.org (8.11.1/8.11.1) id f37Ee1e14247;
	Sat, 7 Apr 2001 07:40:01 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from gnats)
Date: Sat, 7 Apr 2001 07:40:01 -0700 (PDT)
Message-Id: <200104071440.f37Ee1e14247@freefall.freebsd.org>
To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org
Cc: 
From: Thomas Quinot <thomas@cuivre.fr.eu.org>
Subject: Re: ports/26297: New port: devel/florist
Reply-To: Thomas Quinot <thomas@cuivre.fr.eu.org>
Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org

The following reply was made to PR ports/26297; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Thomas Quinot <thomas@cuivre.fr.eu.org>
To: will@FreeBSD.org
Cc: freebsd-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: ports/26297: New port: devel/florist
Date: Sat, 7 Apr 2001 16:39:17 +0200

 Le 2001-04-07, will@FreeBSD.org écrivait :
 
 > There is no way in hell I'm putting a patch like that in the
 > ports tree!  Unless you can convince me otherwise... ;)
 
 Could you be a little more specific as to why you deem the submitted
 port to be inappropriate?
 
 Thanks,
 Thomas.
 
 -- 
     Thomas.Quinot@Cuivre.FR.EU.ORG

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message