From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Nov 4 20:26:13 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 666D016A41F; Fri, 4 Nov 2005 20:26:13 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jkim@FreeBSD.org) Received: from anuket.mj.niksun.com (gwnew.niksun.com [65.115.46.162]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C769943D46; Fri, 4 Nov 2005 20:26:12 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jkim@FreeBSD.org) Received: from niksun.com (anuket [10.70.0.5]) by anuket.mj.niksun.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id jA4KZ9fj094273; Fri, 4 Nov 2005 15:35:09 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from jkim@FreeBSD.org) From: Jung-uk Kim To: Nate Lawson Date: Fri, 4 Nov 2005 15:25:55 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.6.2 References: <200511041203.13837.jkim@FreeBSD.org> <436BC1D6.3080302@root.org> In-Reply-To: <436BC1D6.3080302@root.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200511041525.56697.jkim@FreeBSD.org> X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV devel-20050919/1162/Thu Nov 3 12:15:03 2005 on anuket.mj.niksun.com X-Virus-Status: Clean Cc: freebsd-acpi@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] Please test ACPI-CA 20051021 fix X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Nov 2005 20:26:13 -0000 On Friday 04 November 2005 03:17 pm, Nate Lawson wrote: > Jung-uk Kim wrote: > > If you have booting problems *after* ACPI-CA 20051021 import, > > please try this patch and let me know: > > > > http://people.freebsd.org/~jkim/acpica/rscalc.c.diff > > Sorry, I had already committed the critical part of this patch just > now when I saw that it worked for Peter Holm. No problem. > Feel free to commit the rest of this patch whenever. It doesn't need > more testing before committing. Since you have committed the most important part and there are other problem reports, I'll wait little bit longer. ;-) Thanks, Jung-uk Kim